Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Xeon E5-2618L v4

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U

4 / 8

12,477

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2618L v4

10 / 20

12,429

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Xeon E5-2618L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2618L v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,429 vs 12,477).
❌Launch MSRP is still $779 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U better than Xeon E5-2618L v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2618L v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2618L v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $779 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2618L v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-R (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,477 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — a 64.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U. The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U uses the Barcelo-R (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U scores 12,477 against the Xeon E5-2618L v4's 12,429 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U	Xeon E5-2618L v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	10 / 20+150%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+95%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	25 MB+213%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+20380%	2.5 MB
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Barcelo-R (2023)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	12,477	12,429