
Core Ultra 7 164U

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 164U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2551 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc, while Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 164U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,477 vs 12,625).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 164U moves to FCBGA2551 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 164U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 164U better than Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 164U
The Core Ultra 7 164U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,625 points. Launch price was $448.


Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-R (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,477 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 164U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 7 164U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 164U versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U — a 11% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U uses Barcelo-R (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 164U scores 12,625 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U's 12,477 — a 1.2% lead for the Core Ultra 7 164U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 164U vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+200% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz+109% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-U (2023) | Barcelo-R (2023) |
| PassMark | 12,625+1% | 12,477 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,766 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,131 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,973 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the FCBGA2551 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2551 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-6400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 164U) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U). The Core Ultra 7 164U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 164U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 164U rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












