PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 7 164U vs Xeon W-2133 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 7 164U vs Xeon W-2133: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 7 164U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2551 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc, while Xeon W-2133 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2133, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-2133

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 12.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 164U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,000 vs 8,766).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 164U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 164U moves to FCBGA2551 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 164U better than Xeon W-2133?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2133 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 7 164U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 164U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 164U is the stronger fit. You are getting 46.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 14 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 164U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-2133 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 7 164U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $617 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-2133 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 164U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FCBGA2551 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, 45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 14 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 7 164U vs Xeon W-2133 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 164U

The Core Ultra 7 164U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,625 points. Launch price was $448.

Xeon W-2133

The Xeon W-2133 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $617.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 164U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon W-2133 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 164U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 164U versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-2133 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-2133 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 164U scores 12,625 against the Xeon W-2133's 12,615 — a 0.1% lead for the Core Ultra 7 164U. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,766 vs 6,000 (37.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,131 vs 1,292, a 49% lead for the Core Ultra 7 164U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,973 vs 6,647 (29.8% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 164U vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2133.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 164U	Xeon W-2133
Cores / Threads	12 / 14+100%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+23%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+227%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+45%	8.25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Meteor Lake-U (2023)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	12,625	12,615
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,766+46%	6,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,131+65%	1,292
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,973+35%	6,647

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the FCBGA2551 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2133 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 164U versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2133 — the Core Ultra 7 164U supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2133 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 164U) vs 4 (Xeon W-2133). PCIe lanes: 12 (Core Ultra 7 164U) vs 48 (Xeon W-2133) — the Xeon W-2133 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Meteor Lake-U (Core Ultra 7 164U) and C422 (Xeon W-2133).

Feature	Core Ultra 7 164U	Xeon W-2133
Socket	FCBGA2551	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-6400+140%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	512 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	12	48+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-2133 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 164U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc), while the Xeon W-2133 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 164U targets Enthusiast, Xeon W-2133 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 164U rivals Ryzen 7 7840U; Xeon W-2133 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.