Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen 3 7335U

Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen 3 7335U Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 7 164U

12 / 14

12,625

+0.5%

12,568

0.0%

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen 3 7335U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen 3 7335U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 7 164U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc, while Ryzen 3 7335U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 3 7335U

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 164U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,568 vs 12,625).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 164U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 164U better than Ryzen 3 7335U?

Yes. Core Ultra 7 164U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 24.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 164U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 24.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 164U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 14 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 164U still makes the most sense overall. Core Ultra 7 164U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 164U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 14 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen 3 7335U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 164U

The Core Ultra 7 164U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,625 points. Launch price was $448.

Ryzen 3 7335U

The Ryzen 3 7335U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 12,568 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 164U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 3 7335U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 7 164U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 164U versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7335U — a 11% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7335U uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 164U scores 12,625 against the Ryzen 3 7335U's 12,568 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 7 164U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 164U vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7335U.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 164U	Ryzen 3 7335U
Cores / Threads	12 / 14+200%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+12%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3 GHz+173%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	7 nm	6 nm-14%
Architecture	Meteor Lake-U (2023)	Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	12,625	12,568
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,766	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,131	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,973	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the FCBGA2551 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 7335U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 164U	Ryzen 3 7335U
Socket	FCBGA2551	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-6400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 164U) / not specified (Ryzen 3 7335U). The Core Ultra 7 164U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc), while the Ryzen 3 7335U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 164U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 164U rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.