Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen AI 5 330
Core Ultra 7 164U
Ryzen AI 5 330
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Ultra 7 164U is positioned at rank 675 and the Ryzen AI 5 330 is on rank 608, so the Ryzen AI 5 330 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 164U
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI 5 330
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 164U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($350) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-U (2023) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Krackan Point 2 (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 164U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($350) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 5 330
Core Ultra 7 164U
The Core Ultra 7 164U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,625 points. Launch price was $448.
Ryzen AI 5 330
The Ryzen AI 5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 12,794 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 164U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 7 164U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 164U versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 330 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses Krackan Point 2 (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 164U scores 12,625 against the Ryzen AI 5 330's 12,794 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen AI 5 330. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 164U vs 4 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 330.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+200% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+7% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2 GHz+82% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-U (2023) | Krackan Point 2 (2025) |
| PassMark | 12,625 | 12,794+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,766 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,131 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,973 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the FCBGA2551 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2551 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-6400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 164U) / not specified (Ryzen AI 5 330). The Core Ultra 7 164U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 164U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 164U rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen AI 5 330
