Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen AI 5 330

Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen AI 5 330 Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 7 164U

12 / 14

12,625

0.0%

12,794

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen AI 5 330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen AI 5 330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 7 164U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc, while Ryzen AI 5 330 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,625 vs 12,794).

Ryzen AI 5 330

2025

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 164U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $350 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 164U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 164U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 5 330 better than Core Ultra 7 164U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 7 164U is ahead with a 23.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 5 330 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Core Ultra 7 164U also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 5 330 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 5 330 is the better buy right now. Ryzen AI 5 330 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $350 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core Ultra 7 164U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 23.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (36.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 5 330 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 12/14. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen AI 5 330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 164U

The Core Ultra 7 164U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,625 points. Launch price was $448.

Ryzen AI 5 330

The Ryzen AI 5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 12,794 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 164U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 7 164U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 164U versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 330 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses Krackan Point 2 (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 164U scores 12,625 against the Ryzen AI 5 330's 12,794 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen AI 5 330. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 164U vs 4 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 330.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 164U	Ryzen AI 5 330
Cores / Threads	12 / 14+200%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+7%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2 GHz+82%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+200%	4 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Meteor Lake-U (2023)	Krackan Point 2 (2025)
PassMark	12,625	12,794+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,766	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,131	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,973	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the FCBGA2551 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 164U	Ryzen AI 5 330
Socket	FCBGA2551	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-6400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 164U) / not specified (Ryzen AI 5 330). The Core Ultra 7 164U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 164U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 164U rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.