
Core Ultra 7 164U

Xeon E5-1660 v3
Core Ultra 7 164U vs Xeon E5-1660 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 164U vs Xeon E5-1660 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 164U vs Xeon E5-1660 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 164U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2551 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc, while Xeon E5-1660 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1660 v3, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-1660 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 164U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,582 vs 12,625).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,080 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 164U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 164U moves to FCBGA2551 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 164U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 164U better than Xeon E5-1660 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 164U vs Xeon E5-1660 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 164U
The Core Ultra 7 164U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,625 points. Launch price was $448.

Xeon E5-1660 v3
The Xeon E5-1660 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 12,582 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 164U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon E5-1660 v3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 164U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 164U versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-1660 v3 — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-1660 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 164U scores 12,625 against the Xeon E5-1660 v3's 12,582 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 164U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 164U vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1660 v3.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Xeon E5-1660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+37% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3 GHz+173% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-U (2023) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 12,625 | 12,582 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,766 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,131 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,973 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the FCBGA2551 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-1660 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Xeon E5-1660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2551 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-6400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 164U) / not specified (Xeon E5-1660 v3). The Core Ultra 7 164U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc), while the Xeon E5-1660 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 164U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 164U rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Xeon E5-1660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













