Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E5-2618L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E5-2618L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1680 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,396 vs 12,429).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 16.0 PassMark/$ ($1,723 MSRP vs $779 MSRP).
❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $944 less on MSRP ($779 MSRP vs $1,723 MSRP).
✅Delivers 121.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.0 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($779 MSRP vs $1,723 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1680 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2618L v4 better than Xeon E5-1680 v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-1680 v2 is ahead with a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2618L v4 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2618L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2618L v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2618L v4 comes in $944 cheaper on MSRP at $779 MSRP versus $1,723 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1680 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 121.8% better value on MSRP (16.0 vs 7.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2618L v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-1680 v2

The Xeon E5-1680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,396 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1680 v2 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — a 55.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1680 v2. The Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1680 v2 scores 12,396 against the Xeon E5-2618L v4's 12,429 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2618L v4. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-1680 v2	Xeon E5-2618L v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+77%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)	25 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+10140%	2.5 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	12,396	12,429
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,579	—
Geekbench 6 Single	750	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,500	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E5-1680 v2) / not specified (Xeon E5-2618L v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1680 v2 targets Server/Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-1680 v2 rivals Core i7-4960X.

Feature	Xeon E5-1680 v2	Xeon E5-2618L v4
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Server/Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-1680 v2 was priced at $1723, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 came in at $779. On launch pricing ($1723 vs $779), Xeon E5-2618L v4 was $944 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1680 v2 delivers 7.2 pts/$ vs 16.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — making the Xeon E5-2618L v4 the 75.7% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-1680 v2	Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP	$1723	$779-55%
Performance per Dollar	7.2	16.0+122%
Release Date	2013	2016

Search Xeon E5-1680 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2618L v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.