
Ryzen 3 7335U

Xeon E5-1680 v2
Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-1680 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-1680 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-1680 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 7335U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 130W, a 102W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1680 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1680 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-1680 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,396 vs 12,568).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,723 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7335U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌364.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Ryzen 3 7335U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 7335U better than Xeon E5-1680 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-1680 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 7335U
The Ryzen 3 7335U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 12,568 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-1680 v2
The Xeon E5-1680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,396 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 7335U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-1680 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7335U versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7335U (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7335U uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 7335U scores 12,568 against the Xeon E5-1680 v2's 12,396 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 3 7335U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7335U vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7335U | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+10% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+213% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-73% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 12,568+1% | 12,396 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,579 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 750 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 4,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 7335U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7335U | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 7335U) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E5-1680 v2). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1680 v2 targets Server/Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-1680 v2 rivals Core i7-4960X.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7335U | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Server/Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













