Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-2650L v4

Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-2650L v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 7335U

4 / 8

12,568

0.0%

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2650L v4

14 / 28

12,734

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-2650L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-2650L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 7335U

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2650L v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,568 vs 12,734).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650L v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.

Xeon E5-2650L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7335U moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2650L v4 better than Ryzen 3 7335U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2650L v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 7335U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2650L v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2650L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2650L v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2650L v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 7335U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-2650L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 7335U

The Ryzen 3 7335U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 12,568 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2650L v4

The Xeon E5-2650L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 12,734 points. Launch price was $1,329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 7335U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650L v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7335U versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L v4 — a 52.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7335U (base: 3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7335U uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 7335U scores 12,568 against the Xeon E5-2650L v4's 12,734 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2650L v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7335U vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2650L v4.

Feature	Ryzen 3 7335U	Xeon E5-2650L v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	14 / 28+250%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+72%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+76%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	35 MB+338%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+14529%	3.5 MB
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	12,568	12,734+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 7335U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2650L v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.