Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

AMD

Ryzen 3 7335U

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2640 v4

10 Cores20 Thrd90 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2016

Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-2640 v4 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-2640 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-2640 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 7335U

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.8% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Draws 28W instead of 90W, a 62W reduction.
  • βœ…Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2640 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-2640 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (12,470 vs 12,568).
  • ❌221.4% higher power demand at 90W vs 28W.
  • ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7335U moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 7335U better than Xeon E5-2640 v4?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2640 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 7335U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 7335U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 7335U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 3 7335U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 7335U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/20. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 3 7335U vs Xeon E5-2640 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 3 7335U

The Ryzen 3 7335U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 12,568 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2640 v4

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 12,470 points. Launch price was $939.

⚑

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 7335U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads β€” the Xeon E5-2640 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7335U versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v4 β€” a 23.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7335U (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7335U uses the Rembrandt-R (2023βˆ’2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v4 uses Broadwell (2015βˆ’2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 7335U scores 12,568 against the Xeon E5-2640 v4's 12,470 β€” a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 3 7335U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7335U vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2640 v4.

FeatureRyzen 3 7335UXeon E5-2640 v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
10 / 20+150%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+26%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+25%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
25 MB+213%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+20380%
2.5 MB
Process
6 nm-57%
14 nm
Architecture
Rembrandt-R (2023βˆ’2025)
Broadwell (2015βˆ’2019)
PassMark
12,568
12,470
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 7335U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 7335UXeon E5-2640 v4
Socket
FP7
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%