Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E5-2673 v2

Intel

Xeon E5-1680 v2

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2673 v2

8 Cores16 Thrd110 WWMax: 4 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E5-2673 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E5-2673 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E5-2673 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1680 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $1,723 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 18.2% higher power demand at 130W vs 110W.

Xeon E5-2673 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 110W instead of 130W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (12,331 vs 12,396).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1680 v2 better than Xeon E5-2673 v2?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2673 v2 is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1680 v2 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1680 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-1680 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-1680 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,723 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2673 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-1680 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E5-2673 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E5-1680 v2

The Xeon E5-1680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,396 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon E5-2673 v2

The Xeon E5-2673 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,331 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-1680 v2 and Xeon E5-2673 v2 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v2 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2673 v2 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-1680 v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1680 v2 scores 12,396 against the Xeon E5-2673 v2's 12,331 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-1680 v2. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2673 v2.

FeatureXeon E5-1680 v2Xeon E5-2673 v2
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4 GHz+3%
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.3 GHz+10%
L3 Cache
25 MB (total)
25 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
12,396
12,331
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,579
Geekbench 6 Single
750
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureXeon E5-1680 v2Xeon E5-2673 v2
Socket
LGA2011
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E5-1680 v2) / not specified (Xeon E5-2673 v2). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1680 v2 targets Server/Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-1680 v2 rivals Core i7-4960X.

FeatureXeon E5-1680 v2Xeon E5-2673 v2
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server/Workstation