Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Xeon E5-1680 v2

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Xeon E5-1680 v2 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U

4 / 8

12,477

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-1680 v2

8 / 16

12,396

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Xeon E5-1680 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Xeon E5-1680 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1680 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1680 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-1680 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,396 vs 12,477).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,723 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U better than Xeon E5-1680 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1680 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-1680 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,723 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1680 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-1680 v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Xeon E5-1680 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-R (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,477 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-1680 v2

The Xeon E5-1680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,396 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-1680 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U uses the Barcelo-R (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U scores 12,477 against the Xeon E5-1680 v2's 12,396 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U	Xeon E5-1680 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+10%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+213%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Barcelo-R (2023)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	12,477	12,396
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	8,579
Geekbench 6 Single	—	750
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	4,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U	Xeon E5-1680 v2
Socket	FP6	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	256 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E5-1680 v2). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1680 v2 targets Server/Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-1680 v2 rivals Core i7-4960X.