Core i7-9700E vs Xeon E5-2618L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700E vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700E vs Xeon E5-2618L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700E

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $520 less on MSRP ($259 MSRP vs $779 MSRP).
✅Delivers 204.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 16.0 PassMark/$ ($259 MSRP vs $779 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2618L v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,429 vs 12,575).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.0 vs 48.6 PassMark/$ ($779 MSRP vs $259 MSRP).
❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700E better than Xeon E5-2618L v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2618L v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700E is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700E comes in $520 cheaper on MSRP at $259 MSRP versus $779 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 204.3% better value on MSRP (48.6 vs 16.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-9700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-9700E vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700E

The Core i7-9700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,575 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700E packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-9700E versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700E. The Core i7-9700E uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700E scores 12,575 against the Xeon E5-2618L v4's 12,429 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-9700E. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700E vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4.

Feature	Core i7-9700E	Xeon E5-2618L v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+100%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	25 MB+108%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+10140%	2.5 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	12,575+1%	12,429
Cinebench R23 Multi	6,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,172	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,802	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-9700E) / not specified (Xeon E5-2618L v4). The Core i7-9700E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i7-9700E	Xeon E5-2618L v4
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-9700E was priced at $259, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 came in at $779. On launch pricing ($259 vs $779), Core i7-9700E was $520 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700E delivers 48.6 pts/$ vs 16.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — making the Core i7-9700E the 101.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-9700E	Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP	$259-67%	$779
Performance per Dollar	48.6+204%	16.0
Release Date	2019	2016

Search Core i7-9700E on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2618L v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.