Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4210

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4210 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2670 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+118.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 14 MB).

Trade-offs

❌41.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 85W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4210

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 85W instead of 120W, a 35W reduction.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,463 vs 13,489).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 30 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4210 better than Xeon E5-2670 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4210 is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2670 v3 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2670 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 118.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 14 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2670 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 118.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 14 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4210 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Silver 4210 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4210 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4210 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2670 v3

The Xeon E5-2670 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,489 points. Launch price was $1,589.

Xeon Silver 4210

The Xeon Silver 4210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,463 points. Launch price was $501.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2670 v3 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4210 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2670 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2670 v3 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4210 — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4210 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2670 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4210 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2670 v3 scores 13,489 against the Xeon Silver 4210's 13,463 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2670 v3. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Silver 4210.

Feature	Xeon E5-2670 v3	Xeon Silver 4210
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+20%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+5%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+118%	13.75 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+2460%	10 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	13,489	13,463

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2670 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4210 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2670 v3 versus 2400 on the Xeon Silver 4210 — the Xeon Silver 4210 supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4210 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2670 v3) vs 6 (Xeon Silver 4210). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2670 v3) vs 48 (Xeon Silver 4210) — the Xeon Silver 4210 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2670 v3) and C621 (Xeon Silver 4210).

Feature	Xeon E5-2670 v3	Xeon Silver 4210
Socket	LGA2011	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	1024 GB+33%
RAM Channels	4	6+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	48+20%