
Core i7-8700K

Xeon E5-2670 v3
Core i7-8700K vs Xeon E5-2670 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-8700K vs Xeon E5-2670 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-8700K vs Xeon E5-2670 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-8700K
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2670 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2670 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $359 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2670 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2670 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,489 vs 13,572).
- ❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-8700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-8700K better than Xeon E5-2670 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-8700K vs Xeon E5-2670 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8700K
The Core i7-8700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,572 points. Launch price was $359.

Xeon E5-2670 v3
The Xeon E5-2670 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,489 points. Launch price was $1,589.
Processing Power
The Core i7-8700K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2670 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2670 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-8700K versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2670 v3 — a 41% clock advantage for the Core i7-8700K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-8700K uses the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2670 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8700K scores 13,572 against the Xeon E5-2670 v3's 13,489 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-8700K. L3 cache: 12288 kB on the Core i7-8700K vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2670 v3.
| Feature | Core i7-8700K | Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+52% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+61% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12288 kB | 30 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 13,572 | 13,489 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-8700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2670 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-8700K versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2670 v3 — the Core i7-8700K supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2670 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-8700K) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2670 v3). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-8700K) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2670 v3) — the Xeon E5-2670 v3 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-8700K) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2670 v3).
| Feature | Core i7-8700K | Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+25% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
The Core i7-8700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2670 v3 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-8700K | Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













