
Core i3-13100E
Popular choices:

Core i7-8700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-13100E
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $209 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 142.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.5 vs 37.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 95W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i7-8700K
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,572 vs 13,727).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.8 vs 91.5 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌58.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 60W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-13100E.
Core i3-13100E
2023Core i7-8700K
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $209 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 142.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.5 vs 37.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 95W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,572 vs 13,727).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.8 vs 91.5 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌58.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 60W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-13100E.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-13100E better than Core i7-8700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-13100E | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-13100E | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-13100E | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-13100E | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 339 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-13100E and Core i7-8700K

Core i3-13100E
Core i3-13100E
The Core i3-13100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,727 points. Launch price was $480.

Core i7-8700K
Core i7-8700K
The Core i7-8700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,572 points. Launch price was $359.
Processing Power
The Core i3-13100E packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-8700K offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-8700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-13100E versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-8700K — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-8700K (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i3-13100E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-8700K uses Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100E scores 13,727 against the Core i7-8700K's 13,572 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-13100E. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100E vs 12288 kB on the Core i7-8700K.
| Feature | Core i3-13100E | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12288 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 13,727+1% | 13,572 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,001 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,025 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-13100E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-8700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i3-13100E versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-8700K — the Core i3-13100E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i3-13100E) vs 16 (Core i7-8700K) — the Core i3-13100E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Q670,W680,Z690,Z790 (Core i3-13100E) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-8700K).
| Feature | Core i3-13100E | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-13100E) / not specified (Core i7-8700K). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 730 (Core i3-13100E) and Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-8700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-13100E | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-13100E launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i7-8700K debuted at $359. On MSRP ($150 vs $359), the Core i3-13100E is $209 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-13100E delivers 91.5 pts/$ vs 37.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-8700K — making the Core i3-13100E the 83.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-13100E | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-58% | $359 |
| Performance per Dollar | 91.5+142% | 37.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













