Core i3-13100E vs Xeon E-2374G

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-13100E vs Xeon E-2374G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-13100E vs Xeon E-2374G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-13100E

2023

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 60W instead of 80W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2374G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon E-2374G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E-2374G

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,726 vs 13,727).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 60W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-13100E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-13100E better than Xeon E-2374G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2374G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-13100E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-13100E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-13100E is the better buy right now. Core i3-13100E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E-2374G is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (91.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-13100E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-13100E vs Xeon E-2374G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100E

The Core i3-13100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,727 points. Launch price was $480.

Xeon E-2374G

The Xeon E-2374G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,726 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-13100E and Xeon E-2374G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-13100E versus 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2374G — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2374G (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i3-13100E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E-2374G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100E scores 13,727 against the Xeon E-2374G's 13,726 — a 0% lead for the Core i3-13100E. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100E vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2374G.

Feature	Core i3-13100E	Xeon E-2374G
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5 GHz+14%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.7 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	13,727	13,726
Geekbench 6 Single	2,001	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,025	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-13100E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2374G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-13100E	Xeon E-2374G
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-13100E) / not specified (Xeon E-2374G). The Core i3-13100E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730), while the Xeon E-2374G requires a dedicated GPU.