
Core i3-13100E

Xeon E5-2667 v4
Core i3-13100E vs Xeon E5-2667 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-13100E vs Xeon E5-2667 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-13100E vs Xeon E5-2667 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-13100E
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 135W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 730, while Xeon E5-2667 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2667 v4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2667 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,727 vs 13,776).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2667 v4, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2667 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2667 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌125% higher power demand at 135W vs 60W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-13100E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-13100E.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2667 v4 better than Core i3-13100E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-13100E vs Xeon E5-2667 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100E
The Core i3-13100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,727 points. Launch price was $480.

Xeon E5-2667 v4
The Xeon E5-2667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,776 points. Launch price was $2,057.
Processing Power
The Core i3-13100E packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-13100E versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v4 — a 20% clock advantage for the Core i3-13100E (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-13100E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100E scores 13,727 against the Xeon E5-2667 v4's 13,776 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2667 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100E vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2667 v4.
| Feature | Core i3-13100E | Xeon E5-2667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+22% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+3% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB+108% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB+60% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 13,727 | 13,776 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,001 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,025 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-13100E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-13100E | Xeon E5-2667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-13100E) / not specified (Xeon E5-2667 v4). The Core i3-13100E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730), while the Xeon E5-2667 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-13100E | Xeon E5-2667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 730 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














