Core i3-13100E vs Xeon D-1823NT

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-13100E vs Xeon D-1823NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-13100E vs Xeon D-1823NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-13100E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 730, while Xeon D-1823NT needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1823NT, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon D-1823NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1823NT

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
✅Draws 55W instead of 60W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-13100E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,673 vs 13,727).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-13100E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-13100E better than Xeon D-1823NT?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1823NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-13100E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-13100E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-13100E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-13100E is the better buy right now. Core i3-13100E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (91.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-13100E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2227, 20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-13100E vs Xeon D-1823NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100E

The Core i3-13100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,727 points. Launch price was $480.

Xeon D-1823NT

The Xeon D-1823NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,673 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-13100E packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-1823NT offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon D-1823NT has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-13100E versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1823NT — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-13100E (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i3-13100E is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-13100E scores 13,727 against the Xeon D-1823NT's 13,673 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-13100E. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100E vs 10240 kB on the Xeon D-1823NT.

Feature	Core i3-13100E	Xeon D-1823NT
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+26%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+18%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+20%	10240 kB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	10 nm	—
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	13,727	13,673
Geekbench 6 Single	2,001	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,025	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-13100E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-1823NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-13100E	Xeon D-1823NT
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-13100E) / not specified (Xeon D-1823NT). The Core i3-13100E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730), while the Xeon D-1823NT requires a dedicated GPU.