Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3

Intel

Xeon E5-2683 v4

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 3 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-4669 v3

18 Cores36 Thrd135 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2683 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 120W instead of 135W, a 15W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-4669 v3

2015

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (17,430 vs 17,459).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon E5-2683 v4 better than Xeon E5-4669 v3?
    Yes. Xeon E5-2683 v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2683 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2683 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon E5-2683 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2683 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon E5-2683 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 18/36. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Xeon E5-2683 v4

    The Xeon E5-2683 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,459 points. Launch price was $1,846.

    Intel

    Xeon E5-4669 v3

    The Xeon E5-4669 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,430 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    The Xeon E5-2683 v4 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E5-4669 v3 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4669 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2683 v4 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4669 v3 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2683 v4 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2683 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4669 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2683 v4 scores 17,459 against the Xeon E5-4669 v3's 17,430 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2683 v4. L3 cache: 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4669 v3.

    FeatureXeon E5-2683 v4Xeon E5-4669 v3
    Cores / Threads
    16 / 32
    18 / 36+13%
    Boost Clock
    3 GHz+3%
    2.9 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.1 GHz
    2.1 GHz
    L3 Cache
    40 MB
    45 MB (total)+13%
    L2 Cache
    4 MB
    256K (per core)+6300%
    Process
    14 nm-36%
    22 nm
    Architecture
    Broadwell (2015−2019)
    Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
    PassMark
    17,459
    17,430
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 4.0.

    FeatureXeon E5-2683 v4Xeon E5-4669 v3
    Socket
    LGA2011
    LGA2011
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0+33%
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2400
    Max RAM Capacity
    1536 GB
    RAM Channels
    4
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    40