Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2683 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 120W instead of 135W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,459 vs 17,547).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (40 MB vs 55 MB).

Xeon E5-4669 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 40 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $7,007 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2683 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4669 v4 better than Xeon E5-2683 v4?

Yes. Xeon E5-4669 v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4669 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 37.5% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 40 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4669 v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-4669 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $7,007 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-4669 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 37.5% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 40 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 22 cores / 44 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2683 v4

The Xeon E5-2683 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,459 points. Launch price was $1,846.

Xeon E5-4669 v4

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,547 points. Launch price was $7,007.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2683 v4 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-4669 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2683 v4 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4669 v4 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Both are built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2683 v4 scores 17,459 against the Xeon E5-4669 v4's 17,547 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4669 v4. L3 cache: 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-4669 v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-2683 v4	Xeon E5-4669 v4
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	22 / 44+38%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	40 MB	55 MB+38%
L2 Cache	4 MB	5.5 MB+38%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	17,459	17,547
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,730
Geekbench 6 Single	—	825
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,882

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. Both support up to 1536 GB of RAM. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 40 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2683 v4) and C610 (Xeon E5-4669 v4).

Feature	Xeon E5-2683 v4	Xeon E5-4669 v4
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	1536 GB
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	40