Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Xeon W-11865MLE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Xeon W-11865MLE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Xeon W-11865MLE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2690 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11865MLE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($2,090 MSRP vs $467 MSRP).
❌440% higher power demand at 135W vs 25W.

Xeon W-11865MLE

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,623 less on MSRP ($467 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
✅Delivers 344.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.1 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($467 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 135W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,917 vs 16,027).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-11865MLE better than Xeon E5-2690 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-11865MLE is ahead with a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2690 v3 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2690 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2690 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-11865MLE is the better buy right now. Xeon W-11865MLE comes in $1,623 cheaper on MSRP at $467 MSRP versus $2,090 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2690 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 344.5% better value on MSRP (34.1 vs 7.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-11865MLE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Xeon W-11865MLE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2690 v3

The Xeon E5-2690 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 16,027 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-11865MLE

The Xeon W-11865MLE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 August 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,917 points. Launch price was $467.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2690 v3 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-11865MLE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2690 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 v3 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-11865MLE — a 25% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11865MLE (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Xeon E5-2690 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W-11865MLE uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2690 v3 scores 16,027 against the Xeon W-11865MLE's 15,917 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2690 v3. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11865MLE.

Feature	Xeon E5-2690 v3	Xeon W-11865MLE
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.5 GHz+29%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+73%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+25%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+20380%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	22 nm	10 nm-55%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Tiger Lake-H (2021)
PassMark	16,027	15,917

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2690 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11865MLE uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2690 v3	Xeon W-11865MLE
Socket	LGA2011	FCBGA1787
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	40	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2690 v3 was priced at $2090, while the Xeon W-11865MLE came in at $467. On launch pricing ($2090 vs $467), Xeon W-11865MLE was $1623 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2690 v3 delivers 7.7 pts/$ vs 34.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11865MLE — making the Xeon W-11865MLE the 126.5% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2690 v3	Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP	$2090	$467-78%
Performance per Dollar	7.7	34.1+343%
Release Date	2014	2021

Search Xeon E5-2690 v3 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-11865MLE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.