Xeon E5-2696 v4
VS
EPYC 7272

Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs EPYC 7272

Intel

Xeon E5-2696 v4

22 Cores44 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016
VS
AMD

EPYC 7272

12 Cores24 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2696 v4

#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
123%
#48
Xeon E5-2696 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
96%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
83%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
79%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
79%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
75%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
75%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
75%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
72%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7272

#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
136%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
136%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
131%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
130%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
128%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
122%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
120%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
118%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
104%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
101%
#75
EPYC 7272
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The EPYC 7272 (2019) utilizes 7 nm, 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2696 v4EPYC 7272
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2696 v4EPYC 7272
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2696 v4 and EPYC 7272

Intel

Xeon E5-2696 v4

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,938 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

EPYC 7272

The EPYC 7272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,161 points. Launch price was $625.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the EPYC 7272 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2696 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2696 v4 versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7272 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2696 v4 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7272 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2696 v4 scores 24,938 against the EPYC 7272's 25,161 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7272. L3 cache: 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7272.

FeatureXeon E5-2696 v4EPYC 7272
Cores / Threads
22 / 44+83%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+12%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
55 MB+72%
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
5.5 MB+1000%
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm, 14 nm-50%
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
24,938
25,161
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses the FCLGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7272 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2696 v4EPYC 7272
Socket
FCLGA2011-3
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%