Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6242

Intel

Xeon E5-2696 v4

22 Cores44 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6242

16 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6242 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6242 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6242: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2696 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +150% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 22 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (24,938 vs 24,994).

Xeon Gold 6242

2019

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 55 MB).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon Gold 6242 better than Xeon E5-2696 v4?
    Yes. Xeon Gold 6242 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6242 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6242 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon Gold 6242 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6242 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon Gold 6242 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 22/44. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6242 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Xeon E5-2696 v4

    The Xeon E5-2696 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,938 points. Launch price was $800.

    Intel

    Xeon Gold 6242

    The Xeon Gold 6242 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 24,994 points. Launch price was $2,529.

    Processing Power

    The Xeon E5-2696 v4 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6242 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2696 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2696 v4 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6242 — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6242 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2696 v4 scores 24,938 against the Xeon Gold 6242's 24,994 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6242. L3 cache: 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6242.

    FeatureXeon E5-2696 v4Xeon Gold 6242
    Cores / Threads
    22 / 44+38%
    16 / 32
    Boost Clock
    3.6 GHz
    3.9 GHz+8%
    Base Clock
    2.2 GHz
    2.8 GHz+27%
    L3 Cache
    55 MB+150%
    22 MB
    L2 Cache
    5.5 MB
    16 MB+191%
    Process
    14 nm
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Broadwell (2015−2019)
    Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
    PassMark
    24,938
    24,994
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses the FCLGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureXeon E5-2696 v4Xeon Gold 6242
    Socket
    FCLGA2011-3
    LGA3647
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0