Xeon E5-2696 v4
VS
EPYC 7501

Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs EPYC 7501

Intel

Xeon E5-2696 v4

22 Cores44 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016
VS
AMD

EPYC 7501

32 Cores64 Thrd155 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2696 v4

#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
123%
#48
Xeon E5-2696 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
96%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
83%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
79%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
79%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
75%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
75%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
75%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
72%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7501

#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
101%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
101%
#148
EPYC 7501
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
99%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The EPYC 7501 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2696 v4EPYC 7501
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2696 v4EPYC 7501
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2696 v4 and EPYC 7501

Intel

Xeon E5-2696 v4

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,938 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the EPYC 7501 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2696 v4 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2696 v4 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7501 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2696 v4 scores 24,938 against the EPYC 7501's 24,925 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2696 v4. L3 cache: 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501.

FeatureXeon E5-2696 v4EPYC 7501
Cores / Threads
22 / 44
32 / 64+45%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+20%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+10%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
55 MB
64 MB (total)+16%
L2 Cache
5.5 MB+1000%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark
24,938
24,925
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses the FCLGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7501 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2696 v4EPYC 7501
Socket
FCLGA2011-3
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%