Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6143

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6143 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6143: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2696 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 6143

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,786 vs 24,938).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $342 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2696 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6143 better than Xeon E5-2696 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6143 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2696 v4 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2696 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2696 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6143 is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6143 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $342 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2696 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (72.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6143 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6143 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2696 v4

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,938 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6143

The Xeon Gold 6143 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,786 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6143 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2696 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2696 v4 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6143 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6143 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2696 v4 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2696 v4 scores 24,938 against the Xeon Gold 6143's 24,786 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2696 v4. L3 cache: 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6143.

Feature	Xeon E5-2696 v4	Xeon Gold 6143
Cores / Threads	22 / 44+38%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	55 MB+150%	22 MB
L2 Cache	5.5 MB	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	—
PassMark	24,938	24,786

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses the FCLGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6143 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.