
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4509Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E5-2698 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 23 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4509Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Silver 4509Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 135W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2698 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,749 vs 18,870).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 40 MB).
Xeon E5-2698 v3
2014Xeon Silver 4509Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 23 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 135W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4509Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2698 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,749 vs 18,870).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 40 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2698 v3 better than Xeon Silver 4509Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2698 v3 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2698 v3 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 321 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 287 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E5-2698 v3 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 298 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E5-2698 v3 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Xeon Silver 4509Y

Xeon E5-2698 v3
Xeon E5-2698 v3
The Xeon E5-2698 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 18,870 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4509Y
Xeon Silver 4509Y
The Xeon Silver 4509Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 18,749 points. Launch price was $563.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2698 v3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4509Y offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2698 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698 v3 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4509Y — a 13% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4509Y (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-2698 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2698 v3 scores 18,870 against the Xeon Silver 4509Y's 18,749 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2698 v3. L3 cache: 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs 22.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4509Y.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2698 v3 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 40 MB (total)+78% | 22.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 18,870 | 18,749 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2698 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2698 v3 | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












