Ryzen 7 7445HS vs Xeon E5-2698 v3

Ryzen 7 7445HS vs Xeon E5-2698 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 7445HS

6 / 12

19,008

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2698 v3

16 / 32

18,870

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 7445HS vs Xeon E5-2698 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 7445HS vs Xeon E5-2698 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 7445HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2698 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon E5-2698 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,870 vs 19,008).
❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7445HS better than Xeon E5-2698 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2698 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7445HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7445HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7445HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7445HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 7445HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7445HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 7445HS vs Xeon E5-2698 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 7445HS

The Ryzen 7 7445HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 19,008 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2698 v3

The Xeon E5-2698 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 18,870 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 7445HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2698 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2698 v3 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7445HS versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698 v3 — a 26.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7445HS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7445HS uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2698 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7445HS scores 19,008 against the Xeon E5-2698 v3's 18,870 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 7445HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7445HS vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2698 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7445HS	Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+31%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+39%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	40 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	6 MB	256K (per core)+4167%
Process	4 nm-82%	22 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (2023−2024)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	19,008	18,870

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 7445HS uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2698 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.