Xeon E5-2698 v4
VS
Ryzen 5 7640HS

Xeon E5-2698 v4 vs Ryzen 5 7640HS

Intel

Xeon E5-2698 v4

20 Cores40 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 7640HS

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 5 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2698 v4

#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
125%
#39
Xeon E5-2698 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
98%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
77%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
66%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 5 7640HS (2023) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2698 v4Ryzen 5 7640HS
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2698 v4Ryzen 5 7640HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 5 7640HS

Intel

Xeon E5-2698 v4

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 22,764 points. Launch price was $3,226.

AMD

Ryzen 5 7640HS

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2698 v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698 v4 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7640HS (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2698 v4 scores 22,764 against the Ryzen 5 7640HS's 22,921 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 7640HS. L3 cache: 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2698 v4 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7640HS.

FeatureXeon E5-2698 v4Ryzen 5 7640HS
Cores / Threads
20 / 40+233%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
5 GHz+39%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
4.3 GHz+95%
L3 Cache
50 MB+213%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
5 MB+400%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
22,764
22,921
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2698 v4Ryzen 5 7640HS
Socket
LGA2011
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%