Xeon E5-2698 v4 vs Xeon W-1370

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 vs Xeon W-1370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 vs Xeon W-1370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2698 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,764 vs 22,948).
❌68.8% higher power demand at 135W vs 80W.

Xeon W-1370

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 135W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2698 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1370 better than Xeon E5-2698 v4?

Yes. Xeon W-1370 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-1370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1370 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-1370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $323 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 20/40. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 vs Xeon W-1370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2698 v4

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 22,764 points. Launch price was $3,226.

Xeon W-1370

The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-1370 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2698 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698 v4 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1370 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2698 v4 scores 22,764 against the Xeon W-1370's 22,948 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W-1370. L3 cache: 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2698 v4 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1370.

Feature	Xeon E5-2698 v4	Xeon W-1370
Cores / Threads	20 / 40+150%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	5.1 GHz+42%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.9 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	50 MB+213%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	5 MB+900%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	22,764	22,948

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1370 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.