Xeon E5-2698 v4
VS
Ryzen 7 6800H

Xeon E5-2698 v4 vs Ryzen 7 6800H

Intel

Xeon E5-2698 v4

20 Cores40 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 6800H

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2698 v4

#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
125%
#39
Xeon E5-2698 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
98%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
77%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
66%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 7 6800H (2022) utilizes 6 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2698 v4Ryzen 7 6800H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) / 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2698 v4Ryzen 7 6800H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 7 6800H

Intel

Xeon E5-2698 v4

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 22,764 points. Launch price was $3,226.

AMD

Ryzen 7 6800H

The Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,932 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Ryzen 7 6800H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2698 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698 v4 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800H — a 26.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 6800H (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 6800H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2698 v4 scores 22,764 against the Ryzen 7 6800H's 22,932 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 6800H. L3 cache: 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2698 v4 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 6800H.

FeatureXeon E5-2698 v4Ryzen 7 6800H
Cores / Threads
20 / 40+150%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4.7 GHz+31%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz+45%
L3 Cache
50 MB+213%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
5 MB+900%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
6 nm-57%
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark
22,764
22,932
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,957
Geekbench 6 Single
1,845
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,861
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 6800H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2698 v4Ryzen 7 6800H
Socket
LGA2011
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2698 v4) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 6800H). The Ryzen 7 6800H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Xeon E5-2698 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 6800H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 6800H rivals Core i7-12700H.

FeatureXeon E5-2698 v4Ryzen 7 6800H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 680M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V (SVM)
Target Use
Gaming