Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2

Intel

Xeon E5-2698B V3

16 Cores32 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E7-4809 v2

6 Cores12 Thrd105 WWMax: none2014
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2698B V3

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +24.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +233.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (16,287 vs 16,471).
  • 28.6% higher power demand at 135W vs 105W.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

2014

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 105W instead of 135W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2698B V3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 40 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7-4809 v2 better than Xeon E5-2698B V3?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2698B V3 is ahead with a 24.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-4809 v2 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2698B V3 also has the bigger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-4809 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E7-4809 v2 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E7-4809 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2698B V3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and 233.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 12 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E5-2698B V3

The Xeon E5-2698B V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 16,287 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon E7-4809 v2

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to none. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 16,471 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2698B V3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2698B V3 has 10 more cores. The Xeon E5-2698B V3 is built on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2698B V3 scores 16,287 against the Xeon E7-4809 v2's 16,471 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E7-4809 v2. L3 cache: 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs 12 MB on the Xeon E7-4809 v2.

FeatureXeon E5-2698B V3Xeon E7-4809 v2
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+167%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
none
Base Clock
2 GHz+5%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
40 MB (total)+233%
12 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
16,287
16,471+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2698B V3 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2698B V3Xeon E7-4809 v2
Socket
LGA2011-3
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0