Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs Xeon Gold 6134

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs Xeon Gold 6134 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs Xeon Gold 6134: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2698B V3

2015

Why buy it

✅+61.6% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 25 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,287 vs 16,519).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6134

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 130W instead of 135W, a 5W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,214 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2698B V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6134 better than Xeon E5-2698B V3?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6134 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6134 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6134 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6134 is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6134 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $2,214 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6134 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs Xeon Gold 6134 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2698B V3

The Xeon E5-2698B V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 16,287 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6134

The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2698B V3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6134 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2698B V3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698B V3 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6134 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6134 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2698B V3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2698B V3 scores 16,287 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6134. L3 cache: 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.

Feature	Xeon E5-2698B V3	Xeon Gold 6134
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.2 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	40 MB (total)+62%	24.75 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+3100%	8 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	16,287	16,519+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2698B V3 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.