Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6150

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+122.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 145W instead of 165W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 6150

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2699A v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,447 vs 26,759).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $3,358 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2699A v4 better than Xeon Gold 6150?

Yes. Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 122.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2699A v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6150 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2699A v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $3,358 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6150 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,759 points. Launch price was $4,938.

Xeon Gold 6150

The Xeon Gold 6150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 26,447 points. Launch price was $3,358.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6150 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2699A v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6150 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6150 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2699A v4 scores 26,759 against the Xeon Gold 6150's 26,447 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2699A v4. L3 cache: 55 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6150.

Feature	Xeon E5-2699A v4	Xeon Gold 6150
Cores / Threads	22 / 44+22%	18 / 36
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.7 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.7 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	55 MB (total)+122%	24.75 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	18 MB+7100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-EP (2016)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	26,759+1%	26,447

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.