EPYC 7451 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7451

24 / 48

26,639

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2699A v4

22 / 44

26,759

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7451

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,639 vs 26,759).
❌24.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 145W.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 145W instead of 180W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2699A v4 better than EPYC 7451?

Yes. Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2699A v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2699A v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7451 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7451

The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,759 points. Launch price was $4,938.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7451 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2699A v4 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7451 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7451 scores 26,639 against the Xeon E5-2699A v4's 26,759 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2699A v4. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451 vs 55 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Feature	EPYC 7451	Xeon E5-2699A v4
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+9%	22 / 44
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+16%	55 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	26,639	26,759

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7451 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.