
EPYC 7451

Xeon 6353P
EPYC 7451 vs Xeon 6353P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7451 vs Xeon 6353P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7451 vs Xeon 6353P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7451
2017Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,639 vs 26,910).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6353P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon 6353P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6353P better than EPYC 7451?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7451 vs Xeon 6353P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7451
The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.

Xeon 6353P
The Xeon 6353P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,910 points. Launch price was $426.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7451 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6353P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6353P — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Xeon 6353P (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7451 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon 6353P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7451 scores 26,639 against the Xeon 6353P's 26,910 — a 1% lead for the Xeon 6353P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6353P.
| Feature | EPYC 7451 | Xeon 6353P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz+59% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.7 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+167% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 26,639 | 26,910+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7451 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6353P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7451 | Xeon 6353P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















