EPYC 7451 vs Ryzen 5 7500F

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7451 vs Ryzen 5 7500F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7451 vs Ryzen 5 7500F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7451

2017

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7500F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,639 vs 26,727).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7500F moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 7500F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7451, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while EPYC 7451 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7500F better than EPYC 7451?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7451 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7500F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 7500F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7500F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7500F is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 7500F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $179 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (149.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7500F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7451 vs Ryzen 5 7500F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7451

The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.

Ryzen 5 7500F

The Ryzen 5 7500F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,727 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7451 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7500F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7500F — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7500F (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7451 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7500F uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7451 scores 26,639 against the Ryzen 5 7500F's 26,727 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 7500F. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7500F.

Feature	EPYC 7451	Ryzen 5 7500F
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+300%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	5 GHz+56%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.7 GHz+61%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+100%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	26,639	26,727