EPYC 7451 vs Xeon Gold 6150

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon Gold 6150 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7451

24 / 48

26,639

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6150

18 / 36

26,447

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon Gold 6150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon Gold 6150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7451

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 6150

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 165W instead of 180W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7451 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,447 vs 26,639).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $3,358 MSRP, while EPYC 7451 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7451 better than Xeon Gold 6150?

Yes. EPYC 7451 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7451 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7451 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7451 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6150 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7451 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $3,358 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6150 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7451 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 18/36. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon Gold 6150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7451

The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.

Xeon Gold 6150

The Xeon Gold 6150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 26,447 points. Launch price was $3,358.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7451 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6150 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6150 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6150 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7451 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7451 scores 26,639 against the Xeon Gold 6150's 26,447 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7451. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6150.

Feature	EPYC 7451	Xeon Gold 6150
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+33%	18 / 36
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.7 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+159%	24.75 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+2744%	18 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	26,639	26,447

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7451 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.