EPYC 7451 vs Xeon w3-2435

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon w3-2435 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7451

24 / 48

26,639

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon w3-2435

8 / 16

26,504

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon w3-2435 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon w3-2435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7451

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+184.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 23 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w3-2435 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2435 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w3-2435

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 165W instead of 180W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,504 vs 26,639).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $669 MSRP, while EPYC 7451 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w3-2435 better than EPYC 7451?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w3-2435 is ahead with a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7451 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. EPYC 7451 also has the bigger cache pool with 184.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 23 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7451 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 184.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 23 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w3-2435 is the better buy right now. Xeon w3-2435 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $669 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7451 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w3-2435 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon w3-2435 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7451

The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.

Xeon w3-2435

The Xeon w3-2435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,504 points. Launch price was $669.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7451 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w3-2435 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon w3-2435 — a 33.8% clock advantage for the Xeon w3-2435 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 7451 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon w3-2435 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7451 scores 26,639 against the Xeon w3-2435's 26,504 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7451. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451 vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon w3-2435.

Feature	EPYC 7451	Xeon w3-2435
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+200%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.5 GHz+41%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.1 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+184%	22.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	26,639	26,504

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7451 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2435 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.