EPYC 7451 vs Xeon E-2468

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon E-2468 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7451

24 / 48

26,639

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E-2468

8 / 16

26,652

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon E-2468 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon E-2468: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7451

2017

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,639 vs 26,652).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2468 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Xeon E-2468

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2468 better than EPYC 7451?

Yes. Xeon E-2468 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2468 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2468 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2468 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E-2468 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2468 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7451 vs Xeon E-2468 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7451

The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.

Xeon E-2468

The Xeon E-2468 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,652 points. Launch price was $426.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7451 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon E-2468 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2468 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2468 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7451 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2468 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7451 scores 26,639 against the Xeon E-2468's 26,652 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E-2468. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2468.

Feature	EPYC 7451	Xeon E-2468
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+200%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	5.2 GHz+63%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.6 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+167%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	26,639	26,652

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7451 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2468 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.