Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6252

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6252 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6252: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+53.8% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Draws 145W instead of 150W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,759 vs 27,148).

Xeon Gold 6252

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2699A v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 55 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6252 better than Xeon E5-2699A v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2699A v4 is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6252 pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2699A v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 53.8% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6252 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6252 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6252 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6252 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 22/44. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6252 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,759 points. Launch price was $4,938.

Xeon Gold 6252

The Xeon Gold 6252 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,148 points. Launch price was $3,655.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6252 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6252 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6252 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6252 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2699A v4 scores 26,759 against the Xeon Gold 6252's 27,148 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6252. L3 cache: 55 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6252.

Feature	Xeon E5-2699A v4	Xeon Gold 6252
Cores / Threads	22 / 44	24 / 48+9%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.7 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	55 MB (total)+54%	35.75 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	24 MB+9500%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-EP (2016)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	26,759	27,148+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.