Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs Xeon E5-2699A v4

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

8 / 16

26,852

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2699A v4

22 / 44

26,759

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs Xeon E5-2699A v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 145W, a 137W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+243.8% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,759 vs 26,852).
❌1712.5% higher power demand at 145W vs 8W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS better than Xeon E5-2699A v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2699A v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 22/44. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,759 points. Launch price was $4,938.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699A v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS scores 26,852 against the Xeon E5-2699A v4's 26,759 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs 55 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS	Xeon E5-2699A v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	22 / 44+175%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+42%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+58%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	55 MB (total)+244%
L2 Cache	8 MB+3100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	26,852	26,759

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.