Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
VS
Xeon E-2468

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs Xeon E-2468

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd8 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon E-2468

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E-2468

#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
104%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
103%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
102%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
102%
#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
101%
#185
Xeon E-2468
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
100%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
100%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E-2468 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen 7 PRO 7840HSXeon E-2468
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen 7 PRO 7840HSXeon E-2468
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon E-2468

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E-2468

The Xeon E-2468 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,652 points. Launch price was $426.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon E-2468 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2468 — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2468 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E-2468 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS scores 26,852 against the Xeon E-2468's 26,652 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2468.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 7840HSXeon E-2468
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.2 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+46%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB
24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
8 MB+300%
2 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-43%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
26,852
26,652
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2468 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 7840HSXeon E-2468
Socket
FP7/FP8
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%