Xeon E5-4607 vs Xeon E5-4640

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4607 vs Xeon E5-4640 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4607 vs Xeon E5-4640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4607

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4640 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,986 vs 7,012).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 20 MB).

Xeon E5-4640

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $2,725 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4607 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4640 better than Xeon E5-4607?

Yes. Xeon E5-4640 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4640 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4640 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4640 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-4640 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $2,725 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-4640 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-4607 vs Xeon E5-4640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4607

The Xeon E5-4607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,986 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-4640

The Xeon E5-4640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,012 points. Launch price was $2,730.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4607 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4640 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4640 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4607 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 — a 24% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-4640 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4607 scores 6,986 against the Xeon E5-4640's 7,012 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-4640. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4607 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4640.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607	Xeon E5-4640
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	15 MB (total)	20480 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	6,986	7,012