Xeon E5-4607 vs Xeon W3680

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4607 vs Xeon W3680 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4607 vs Xeon W3680: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4607

2012

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3680 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,986 vs 7,025).

Xeon W3680

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $594 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4607 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W3680 better than Xeon E5-4607?

Yes. Xeon W3680 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W3680 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3680 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W3680 is the better buy right now. Xeon W3680 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $594 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-4607 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-4607 vs Xeon W3680 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4607

The Xeon E5-4607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,986 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W3680

The Xeon W3680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $350.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-4607 and Xeon W3680 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4607 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3680 — a 48.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W3680 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Xeon E5-4607 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W3680 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4607 scores 6,986 against the Xeon W3680's 7,025 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W3680. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4607 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3680.

Feature	Xeon E5-4607	Xeon W3680
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+64%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.33 GHz+51%
L3 Cache	15 MB (total)+25%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)	Gulftown (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,986	7,025

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4607 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W3680 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.