Xeon E3-1265L v4 vs Xeon E5-4607

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1265L v4 vs Xeon E5-4607 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1265L v4 vs Xeon E5-4607: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1265L v4

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, while Xeon E5-4607 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,954 vs 6,986).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4607 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4607

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1265L v4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1265L v4 better than Xeon E5-4607?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E3-1265L v4 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4607 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4607 also has the bigger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4607 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1265L v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1265L v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $417 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4607 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1265L v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E3-1265L v4 vs Xeon E5-4607 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1265L v4

The Xeon E3-1265L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,954 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-4607

The Xeon E5-4607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,986 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1265L v4 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4607 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-4607 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v4 versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4607 — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v4 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E3-1265L v4 uses the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4607 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1265L v4 scores 6,954 against the Xeon E5-4607's 6,986 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4607. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v4 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4607.

Feature	Xeon E3-1265L v4	Xeon E5-4607
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+50%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+5%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-DT (2015)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	6,954	6,986
Cinebench R23 Multi	4,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	900	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1265L v4 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4607 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E3-1265L v4	Xeon E5-4607
Socket	LGA1150	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1265L v4) / not specified (Xeon E5-4607). The Xeon E3-1265L v4 includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics P6300), while the Xeon E5-4607 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1265L v4 targets Server.