Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E3-1265L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E3-1265L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E3-1265L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700T

2015

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 16.7 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1265L v4, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1265L v4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon E3-1265L v4

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, while Core i7-6700T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,954 vs 6,994).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.7 vs 23.1 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6700T better than Xeon E3-1265L v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1265L v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-6700T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-6700T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6700T is the better buy right now. Core i7-6700T comes in $114 cheaper on MSRP at $303 MSRP versus $417 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 38.4% better value on MSRP (23.1 vs 16.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6700T vs Xeon E3-1265L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6700T

The Core i7-6700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,994 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon E3-1265L v4

The Xeon E3-1265L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,954 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-6700T and Xeon E3-1265L v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6700T versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v4 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-6700T (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-6700T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v4 uses Broadwell-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700T scores 6,994 against the Xeon E3-1265L v4's 6,954 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-6700T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700T vs 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v4.

Feature	Core i7-6700T	Xeon E3-1265L v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+9%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+22%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Broadwell-DT (2015)
PassMark	6,994	6,954
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	4,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v4 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-6700T	Xeon E3-1265L v4
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-6700T) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1265L v4). The Xeon E3-1265L v4 includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics P6300), while the Core i7-6700T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1265L v4 targets Server.

Feature	Core i7-6700T	Xeon E3-1265L v4
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6700T was priced at $303, while the Xeon E3-1265L v4 came in at $417. On launch pricing ($303 vs $417), Core i7-6700T was $114 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700T delivers 23.1 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1265L v4 — making the Core i7-6700T the 32.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-6700T	Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP	$303-27%	$417
Performance per Dollar	23.1+38%	16.7
Release Date	2015	2015

Search Core i7-6700T on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1265L v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.