
Xeon E5-4627 v3 vs Xeon E5-2630 v4

Xeon E5-4627 v3

Xeon E5-2630 v4
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-4627 v3 is positioned at rank 989 and the Xeon E5-2630 v4 is on rank 877, so the Xeon E5-2630 v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-4627 v3
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2630 v4
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-4627 v3 | Xeon E5-2630 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($130) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-4627 v3 | Xeon E5-2630 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+55%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($130) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-4627 v3 and Xeon E5-2630 v4

Xeon E5-4627 v3
The Xeon E5-4627 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,344 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2630 v4
The Xeon E5-2630 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,434 points. Launch price was $667.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-4627 v3 packs 10 cores / 10 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2630 v4's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4627 v3 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-4627 v3 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-4627 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4627 v3 scores 11,344 against the Xeon E5-2630 v4's 11,434 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2630 v4. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 970 vs 1,032, a 6.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2630 v4 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,500 vs 5,368 (19.1% advantage for the Xeon E5-4627 v3). L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4627 v3 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2630 v4.
| Feature | Xeon E5-4627 v3 | Xeon E5-2630 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10 | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+3% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+18% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2.5 MB+900% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 11,344 | 11,434 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 970 | 1,032+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,500+21% | 5,368 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-4627 v3 versus DDR4 1600/1866/2133 on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — the Xeon E5-2630 v4 supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2630 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 40 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C612 (Xeon E5-4627 v3) and C612 (Xeon E5-2630 v4).
| Feature | Xeon E5-4627 v3 | Xeon E5-2630 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB | 1536 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon E5-4627 v3) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E5-2630 v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2630 v4 targets Workstation / Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5-4627 v3 | Xeon E5-2630 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x / VT-d / EPT |
| Target Use | — | Workstation / Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-4627 v3 launched at $2225 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 debuted at $1171. At current prices ($200 vs $130), the Xeon E5-2630 v4 is $70 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-4627 v3 delivers 56.7 pts/$ vs 88.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — making the Xeon E5-2630 v4 the 43.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-4627 v3 | Xeon E5-2630 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2225 | $1171-47% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $130-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.7 | 88.0+55% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















