Xeon E5-4627 v4 vs Xeon E5-2660 v3
Xeon E5-4627 v4
Xeon E5-2660 v3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-4627 v4 is positioned at rank #988 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-4627 v4
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2660 v3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-4627 v4 | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-4627 v4 | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+34%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Xeon E5-2660 v3
Xeon E5-4627 v4
The Xeon E5-4627 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,969 points. Launch price was $2,225.
Xeon E5-2660 v3
The Xeon E5-2660 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,039 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-4627 v4 packs 10 cores / 10 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2660 v3's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4627 v4 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v3 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2660 v3 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-4627 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2660 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4627 v4 scores 12,969 against the Xeon E5-2660 v3's 13,039 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2660 v3. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4627 v4 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660 v3.
| Feature | Xeon E5-4627 v4 | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10 | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB | 25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB+900% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 12,969 | 13,039 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,105 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,936 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Xeon E5-4627 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 40 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C610 (Xeon E5-4627 v4) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2660 v3).
| Feature | Xeon E5-4627 v4 | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 GB+100% | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | 40 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon E5-2660 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon E5-4627 v4) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2660 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2660 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5-4627 v4 | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-4627 v4 launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2660 v3 debuted at $1445. At current prices ($200 vs $150), the Xeon E5-2660 v3 is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-4627 v4 delivers 64.8 pts/$ vs 86.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2660 v3 — making the Xeon E5-2660 v3 the 29.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-4627 v4 | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $1445-42% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $150-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.8 | 86.9+34% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Xeon E5-2660 v3
