Xeon E5-4627 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6128

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4627 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6128 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4627 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6128: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4627 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+29.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 19 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $2,500 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6128 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌17.4% higher power demand at 135W vs 115W.

Xeon Gold 6128

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 115W instead of 135W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,887 vs 12,969).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 25 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6128 better than Xeon E5-4627 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6128 is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4627 v4 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4627 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 29.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4627 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 29.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6128 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4627 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6128 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4627 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4627 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6128 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-4627 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6128 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4627 v4

The Xeon E5-4627 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,969 points. Launch price was $2,225.

Xeon Gold 6128

The Xeon Gold 6128 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,887 points. Launch price was $1,697.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4627 v4 packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6128 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-4627 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4627 v4 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6128 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6128 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-4627 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6128 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4627 v4 scores 12,969 against the Xeon Gold 6128's 12,887 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-4627 v4. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4627 v4 vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6128.

Feature	Xeon E5-4627 v4	Xeon Gold 6128
Cores / Threads	10 / 10+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.4 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	25 MB+30%	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	2.5 MB	6 MB+140%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	12,969	12,887
Geekbench 6 Single	1,105	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,936	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4627 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6128 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-4627 v4	Xeon Gold 6128
Socket	LGA2011	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	40	—